Member's Library I am what the librarians have made me . . . B. K. Sandwell
  • About
    • About NAIWE
    • Board of Experts
    • Books Published by NAIWE Experts
    • FAQs
    • Advertising
  • Member’s Area
    • Member’s Library
    • Member Website Development
    • Benefit Links and Passcodes
    • Manage Your Account
    • The Member’s Edge
    • NAIWE Media
    • On-Demand Training (Discount)
  • Training
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • On-Demand Training (Discount)
  • Find a Professional
  • News & Events
    • Blog
    • The Edge
    • The Member’s Edge
    • The Edge Writers Guidelines
    • Conference
    • Podcasts
    • Summer Challenge
    • Words Matter
      • Words Matter Week
      • How to Participate
      • Media
  • Post a Job
  • Contact
  • Member Sites

One Question: The 5 W’s or an H of Short-Story Writing

Thursday, November Post a comment

As a writer and editor of short fiction, I often see new short-story writers trying to do too much in too little space. While longer fiction forms, such as novels, provide numerous opportunities for exploring subjects from multiple angles, the short story is best served by a narrower focus. That’s not to say that a short story writer can’t incorporate multiple storytelling elements, like plot, character, setting, dialogue, etc. Of course, they can! Rather, one should utilize them to spotlight one of the “WH-questions,” (i.e., who, what, when, where, why, and how), setting that interrogative at their story’s heart.

Many of you may be familiar with WH-questions from learning journalism basics in school. These queries provide the skeleton for articles, features, profile pieces, etc. They are as follows:

  • Who: Who’s the story about?
  • What: What’s happening in the story?
  • When: When is the story taking place?
  • Where: Where does the story take place?
  • Why: Why is it important that readers know this story?
  • How: How did the events come to pass?

While the news typically requires answers for all six questions, the short story provides more leeway. Indeed, some of the most effective short stories find authors selecting one (or possibly two) queries to focus on when crafting narratives. By narrowing to these one to two primary questions and layering on elements, motifs, and styles as means of providing answers, authors maximize the effectiveness of their short-story writing.

Consider the stories featuring Arthur Conan Doyle’s world-famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. Narrated by the investigator’s confidante, John Watson, the Holmes stories focus on the question of “How?” Through Watson, Doyle reveals not only how the crime of the story was committed, but also how Holmes is able to deduce the perpetrator(s) of said crime. Every element builds toward these revelations. Doyle, via Watson, provides readers with some clues—enough that one might come close to guessing a solution. However, it’s through Holmes’s hyper-observational, logical mind that we learn the full solution in triumphant fashion at story’s end.

“How?” as the central question of mystery is perhaps the clearest example of using WH-questions in short stories. But other genres also lend themselves to one or two questions. Horror stories often focus on “What?” as in: What is the threat/monster/evil plaguing the protagonist? Literary fiction, which tends to focus on character over plot, is rife with tales focused on “Who?”

Note: while short-story writers can (and should) ask these primary questions in their stories, they are not obligated to answer them. Flannery O’Connor’s chilling tale “A Good Man is Hard to Find,” explores the “Why?” behind the title. Through the dialogue of the grandmother and the murderous Misfit, O’Connor explores this question of why society is changing, why the world no longer conforms to the expectations of older generations, etc. But the bleak ending doesn’t provide definitive answers.

Think about the story you want to write. What question is at its heart? Are you using the elements of fiction to spotlight it? Are you attempting to answer or at least present the question in such a way that leaves readers with that query on their mind? Doing so is a great way to refine your story, making it the best that it can be.

 

Patrick Barb
The Short Story Expert

Patrick Barb is an author of weird, dark, and spooky stories, hailing from the southern United States and currently living (and trying not to freeze to death) with his wife, two kids, and a naughty (but lovable) puppy in Saint Paul, Minnesota. As a writer, his short fiction appears in Best Horror of the Year Vol. 16, Nightscript, Diabolical Plots, and Cosmic Horror Monthly, among other publications. His longer works include the novellas Gargantuana’s Ghost, Turn, and The Nut House, the novelettes Helicopter Parenting in the Age of Drone Warfare and “So Quiet, So White” in Split Scream Vol. 3, and his dark fiction collections The Children’s Horror and Pre-Approved for Haunting. Barb is an active member and trustee of the Horror Writers Association and a full member of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association.

Categories: Characters, Fiction, NAIWE Board of Experts, Patrick Barb, Setting, Voice

A Screenwriter’s Take on Visual Language

Monday, October Post a comment

One could argue that film, the precise blend of dialogue, visuals, special effects, and music, is the ultimate form of communication. As a screenwriter (doing my small part to create films), appropriately understanding and applying the English language plays a huge role: especially when it comes to expressing character thought with accurate and realistic dialogue. As society turns to technology for everyday needs, the English language will continue to adapt and eventually become the ultimate universal language. As a professional screenwriter, I hope to blend the English language with technology and convey heart-felt stories to diverse audiences, worldwide.

Technology has always influenced the English language, but recently, word formation methods like shortening (alphabetism, acronymy, clipping and backformation) and blending are on the rise to keep up with space and time saving trends that co-exist with today’s technology. In How English Works, Anne Curzan and Michael P. Adams discuss the trend of eliminating nonessential punctuation and characters from newspaper headlines and paperback books in the 20th century — as a means to save space and time (Curzan and Adams 459-460). Today, when it comes to the news and virtual media outlets, these space and time saving trends continue. Take for example the 140-character limit on Twitter. This social media platform has mastered the art of telling the news via headlines only. According to Craig Smith of DMR statistics, there are 1.3 billion registered users on Twitter (Smith). Imagine the space and time saved when all these tweets add up! As virtual communication becomes the only form of communication, space and time saving word formation methods will prove more effective and become more popular.  Enter the emoticon.

Emoticons, although controversial, are a widely used form of picto-graphic e-communication. I believe they are a major part of the continued expansion of the English language.  In a recent article, Author Quinn Bartlett stated, “. . . the assumption that emoticons are fundamentally a juvenile form of communication not worthy of consideration as a legitimate language is to hold society to a self-imposed standard which is both unrealistic, limiting, and ignorant of human history” (Bartlett).

Genius that we can say all this with just a few pics, dontcha think? Genius but not new. Over 40,000 years ago logographic writing appeared in the form of hieroglyphics, in ancient Egyptian societies (Scoville).

To this day scientists struggle with understanding the true meaning of hieroglyphic communication. Perhaps, in attempting to translate these pictorial messages, scientists are wasting their time. Just as its important to look back at history for answers, it is also important to consider that English is not an absolute, and never has been (Bartlett). If we were scientists studying emoticons, we would never assume the receiver was sitting at home, sulking over a bad break-up with a guy named Harry.  Similarly, one may never completely decipher 40,000 year- old Egyptian conversations. When discussing the meaning of words in context, in their book, How English Works, Anne Curzan and Michael P. Adams state, “Sentences, when uttered, can mean much more than the denotational meaning of the words they contain, and they can do more than describe or refer to the world around us” (Curzan and Adams 236). Hieroglyphic communication may too, mean much more than the intricate picture displayed, only to have been truly understood by the sender(s) and the receiver(s) at that precise moment in time.

Hieroglyphs, documentaries, feature films, emoticons: no matter the influence from technology, they all tell a story.  And for each reader/viewer/receiver, in context, each tells a different story — a highly personal one. As the English language evolves, linguistics, English and writing professionals will take on new roles, and function side-by-side, as partners with technology. Understanding the English language, where it has been and where it is going, will surely help these partnerships grow. Within this new role, as a screenwriter, my goal is to script stories in a manner that generates the empathetic appeal necessary to personally reach all audiences —  throughout time.

 

Bartlett, Quinn. “Emoticons, a Return to Hieroglyphics?” Revelfoundry.com. 2 October 2014. Web. 24 July 2016.

Curzan, Anne and Michael P. Adams. “How English Works: A Linguistic Introduction.” 3rd ed. Pearson, 2012.

Scoville, Priscilla. “Egyptian Hieroglyphs,” Ancient History Encyclopedia. 2 July 2015. Web. 24 July 2016.

Sherman, Robert. “Online Hieroglyphics Translator.” Quizland.com. 1996-2016. Web. 24 July 2016.

Smith, Craig. “By the Numbers: 170 + Amazing Twitter Statistics.” DMR.com. 14 July 2016. Web. 24 July 2016.

 

 

Ashley Henyan is a digital marketing consultant, a freelance writer, and the executive director for the American Red Cross of Lowcountry South Carolina. Previously, she held leadership roles in digital communications and media relations with the Red Cross (the 2017 Harris Poll Non-profit Brand of the Year). Ashley has-developed curriculum and trained hundreds of staff and volunteers across the United States in courses like Leveraging Your Story on LinkedIn and Social Media Story Telling. She has been invited to discuss social media marketing and brand visibility on various podcasts and with local and national associations. Ashley has played an integral part in award-winning social media campaigns including honorable mention recognition with the PR Daily Content Marketing Awards and numerous Silver Telly Awards for Branded Content. She holds a B.A. in government and politics from the University of Maryland and an M.A. in English and creative writing with a concentration in screenwriting from Southern New Hampshire University. Ashley’s work as a ghostwriter has appeared in national and international publications including Yahoo News, China Global Television Network, and The CEO Magazine.

 

Categories: Ashley Henyan, Voice, Writing

Passive Voice, Static Voice—What’s All The Fuss About?

Friday, March Post a comment

As writers, we naturally write the way we write naturally. But readers can’t hear the cadence of the words playing out in our heads as our fingers fly across the keys. Readers’ minds merely decipher the little black marks on the page or the pixels on the screen. So “Mom was calling every week; Dad was emailing every day” cannot possibly convey the sense of urgency the author wants to impart because the reader can’t feel it—it’s over, it’s way in the past, it’s a “was.” It’s passive.

Ah, but suppose the line read: “Mom called every week; Dad emailed every day,” with no extra “it’s all over” verb standing between the doer and the deed? Now the reader feels the author’s irritation and can sympathize, snicker, or simply roll their eyes. It’s active.

And “static writing is . . . ?” I hear you ask. Extra words, albeit not necessarily “to be” verbs, that stretch out the sentence or obfuscate its meaning. “I extracted a sample of both of their DNA from the inside of their mouths.”

The line is static: it has no life, it has no energy, it just relays flat, lifeless information. Maybe that’s okay for a textbook or dissertation, but for commercial writing? Ugh.

But suppose the line read: “I extracted DNA samples from inside both their mouths.” Doesn’t that sing a little sweeter? It provides the same information without holding the reader hostage for an extra six words and so pumps the material forward. It’s active.

And that, in 200 little words, is what the passive/static voice fuss is all about!

 

Claudia Suzanne is a consummate ghostwriter/teacher, understanding what authors need in order to successfully complete their book dream, and she has a finely honed talent for communicating what she knows to her students and clients. Popularly dubbed “The Einstein of Ghostwriting,” Claudia has entertained and informed tens of thousands of writers, editors, journalists, and aspiring authors at countless writer and professional meetings, conferences, radio and BlogTalk radio broadcasts, webinars, and podcasts. Claudia was an invited expert on Penguin’s Author Solutions Expert Video series and a featured entrepreneur in Orange County Business Journal and Norwegian Business Daily. Her signature title, This Business of Books: A Complete Overview of the Industry from Concept through Sales, earned her a 2018 Author of Influence Award from Connected Women of Influence.

Categories: Claudia Suzanne, Ghostwriting, Voice, Writing

Recent Posts

  • Beyond Writing: How Expanding Your Services Can Strengthen Your Freelance Business
  • Am I a Writer or Not?
  • Be Prepared for That Crisis Moment When You Need Business Backup
  • Stick with Your System
  • In a Pricing Rut? Try These 3 Strategies

Categories

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Latest Posts

Beyond Writing: How Expanding Your Services Can Strengthen Your Freelance Business

July 22, 2026

Am I a Writer or Not?

July 16, 2026

Be Prepared for That Crisis Moment When You Need Business Backup

June 30, 2026

Stick with Your System

June 29, 2026

In a Pricing Rut? Try These 3 Strategies

June 25, 2026

Improving Your Vision

June 24, 2026

Contact Us

  • 804-476-4484
  • P.O. Box 412
    Montpelier, VA 23192-0412
Facebook Instagram Linkedin twitter

© NAIWE. All rights reserved. Designed by My House of Design.